This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/35373] [4.4 Regression] bootstraping on powerpc with 128bit long double fails with revision 132578
- From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Mar 2008 07:06:46 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/35373] [4.4 Regression] bootstraping on powerpc with 128bit long double fails with revision 132578
- References: <bug-35373-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #11 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-07 07:06 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created an attachment (id=15276)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15276&action=view) [edit]
> Updated patch to disallow TFmode and TDmode from reg+reg addressing
>
> Here is an updated patch that not only fixes the bootstrap issue, but also
> fixes a regression of the vect-64.c test case, both of which were being caught
> by the new gcc_assert added by Joseph.
Is there a reason why you don't use GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) != N in the
expression?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35373