This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/34933] no .XOR. operator
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 23 Jan 2008 07:03:42 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/34933] no .XOR. operator
- References: <bug-34933-8277@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-23 07:03 -------
For the mentioed patch see PR 33432
I'm not sure whether it makes sense to implement it, but if one could hide it
behind a -fxor / -fno-xor.
Ifort 10.1 has for instance:
-assume noold_xor
Prevents the compiler from defining .XOR. as an intrinsic operator. This
lets you specify .XOR. as a user-defined operator. The default is
-assume old_xor, which tells the compiler to define .XOR. as an intrinsic
operator.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34933