This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/34876] Can't read/write array sections with negative stride not specified
- From: "pault at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 23 Jan 2008 06:45:06 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/34876] Can't read/write array sections with negative stride not specified
- References: <bug-34876-15620@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-23 06:45 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> we just bail out right now when we need to actually do something.
Yes, that's what I thought. In the circumstance where this block "exists", ie.
there is one beyond it, bailing out is OK. What does setting the block beyond
the current one do, given that it is also bailing out? I suppose that all the
preceeding blocks are written, or the file length is set to have at least that
number of blocks?
Anyway, good luck. I need to try to fix PR34429 asap.
Cheers
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34876