This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/34852] [4.3 Regression] Revision 131576 miscompiled 178.galgel
- From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 Jan 2008 16:42:25 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/34852] [4.3 Regression] Revision 131576 miscompiled 178.galgel
- References: <bug-34852-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #15 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-01-21 16:42 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 131576 miscompiled 178.galgel
> I tried -mpc64. It also works.
I would declare this a proof that it is extra preccision issue and
simply update testers to use -mpc64. It is what most of other compilers
do anyway and thus we would get more comparable scores. Thanks a lot for
testing it (I've scheduled same test for tonight, but you've beaten me.
I still will try if it works for -mfpmath=sse case too)
Honza
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34852