This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/34843] Missing overflow diagnostic for Python 2.5's unicodeobject.c



------- Comment #2 from ian at airs dot com  2008-01-18 16:32 -------
When I compile this code with current mainline with -O3 -Wstrict-overflow=3 I
get the following warnings:

Objects/unicodeobject.c: In function ?unicode_startswith?:
Objects/unicodeobject.c:6943: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will
break strict-aliasing rules
Objects/unicodeobject.c:6947: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will
break strict-aliasing rules
Objects/unicodeobject.c: In function ?unicode_endswith?:
Objects/unicodeobject.c:6989: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will
break strict-aliasing rules
Objects/unicodeobject.c:6992: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will
break strict-aliasing rules
Objects/unicodeobject.c: In function ?unicode_expandtabs?:
Objects/unicodeobject.c:5719: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur
when simplifying conditional to constant
Objects/unicodeobject.c:5727: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur
when simplifying conditional to constant
Objects/unicodeobject.c: In function ?rsplit?:
Objects/unicodeobject.c:368: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur
when simplifying conditional to constant
Objects/unicodeobject.c: In function ?PyUnicodeUCS4_Join?:
Objects/unicodeobject.c:4659: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur
when simplifying conditional to constant
Objects/unicodeobject.c: In function ?PyUnicodeUCS4_Compare?:
Objects/unicodeobject.c:5376: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur
when changing X +- C1 cmp C2 to X cmp C1 +- C2
Objects/unicodeobject.c:5376: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur
when changing X +- C1 cmp C2 to X cmp C1 +- C2

The code you are talking about seems to be around line 5722, so this seems to
provide the warnings that you are looking for.

So: which compiler are you using?  What output do you see?


-- 

ian at airs dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2008-01-18 16:32:45
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34843


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]