This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines
- From: "zadeck at naturalbridge dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Jan 2008 02:10:34 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines
- References: <bug-26854-271@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #57 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-01-18 02:10 -------
Subject: Re: Inordinate compile times on large
routines
lucier at math dot purdue dot edu wrote:
> ------- Comment #56 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-01-18 01:38 -------
> gcc is now 5-6 times faster than it was nearly two years ago when this was
> first reported; many changes have made significant improvements in cpu time.
>
> But Steven Bosscher's patch from December still improved things more on this
> test case.
>
> In particular, on 12/20/2007, without the patch, CPU time from
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14799
>
> was
>
> TOTAL : 300.21 19.16 319.52
> 778432 kB
>
> After Steven Bosscher's patch
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34400#c28
>
> it was
>
> TOTAL : 210.97 15.80 226.88
> 778432 kB
>
> and today it's
>
> TOTAL : 281.08 18.03 299.41
> 776514 kB
>
> Would it still be a good idea to apply Steven's patch?
>
>
>
the plan is to apply all of the patches, they each deal with a
different problem and the improvement should be additive.
kenny
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854