This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug debug/34249] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
- From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Jan 2008 17:25:47 -0000
- Subject: [Bug debug/34249] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
- References: <bug-34249-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #9 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 17:25 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> It isn't fixed. The error went from as to ld:
Here is my log:
Executing on host: /home/uros/gcc-build-all/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/uros/gcc-build-all/gcc/ /home/uros/gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/
testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c -O2 -freorder-blocks-and-partition
-fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE -fno-show-
column -lm -o /home/uros/gcc-build-all/gcc/testsuite/gcc/bb-reorg.x02
(timeout = 300)
PASS: gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
:/home/uros/gcc-build-all/gcc:/home/uros/gcc-build-all/gcc/32::/home/uros/gcc-build-all
/gcc:/home/uros/gcc-build-all/gcc/32:/usr/local/lib64:/usr/lib/xorg:/usr/lib64/xorg
PASS: gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c execution, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
testcase /home/uros/gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/tree-prof.exp
completed in 2 seconds
GNU ld version 2.17.50.0.3-6 20060715
The difference between non-working (.s_) and working (.s) asm dump is:
--- bb-reorg.s_ 2008-01-16 18:22:01.000000000 +0100
+++ bb-reorg.s 2008-01-16 18:22:40.000000000 +0100
@@ -147,9 +147,12 @@
.LASFDE3:
.long .LASFDE3-.Lframe1
.long .LFB15
- .long .LFE15-.LFB15
+ .long .LHOTB1
+ .long .LHOTE1-.LHOTB1
+ .long .LCOLDB1
+ .long .LCOLDE1-.LCOLDB1
.uleb128 0x0
.align 8
.LEFDE3:
- .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.3.0 20080107 (experimental) [trunk revision
131375]"
+ .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.3.0 20080114 (experimental) [trunk revision
131520]"
.section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
Is the problem with binutils here?
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34249