This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/33763] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Bogus inlining failed in call to `xxx': redefined extern inline functions are not considered for inlining
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Jan 2008 17:25:07 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/33763] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Bogus inlining failed in call to `xxx': redefined extern inline functions are not considered for inlining
- References: <bug-33763-87@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 17:25 -------
So do I and even am using that patch for quite some time in our gcc packages.
But Mark objected to that:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00589.html
The current state of things is bad, because with glibc 2.7+ several valid
programs don't compile. And this late in stage3 is probably dangerous to play
with two different bodies in cgraph.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33763