This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/34400] [4.3 regression] bad interaction between DF and SJLJ exceptions
- From: "zadeck at naturalbridge dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 17 Dec 2007 16:33:57 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/34400] [4.3 regression] bad interaction between DF and SJLJ exceptions
- References: <bug-34400-286@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #36 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-12-17 16:33 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] bad interaction between
DF and SJLJ exceptions
ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #35 from ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org 2007-12-17 16:16 -------
> Created an attachment (id=14784)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14784&action=view)
> --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14784&action=view)
> Results of gnat1 -ftime-report [...] g-catiio.adb with SJLJ exceptions
>
> $ time ../../gnat1 -ftime-report -dumpbase g-catiio.adb -O2 -W -Wall -g -gnatpg
> -mtune=generic -gnatO g-catiio.o g-catiio.adb > /tmp/pr34400-time-report.txt
> 2>&1
>
> real 0m54.039s
> user 0m53.647s
> sys 0m0.332s
>
> With df_hack2, df_hack3 and df_double_queue_worklist applied.
>
>
>
I am looking at this time report and i do not see anything thing that
looks like df is taking an inordinate amount of time. i could be
missing something.
but it looks like there are a lot of passes that are eating big chunks
of time here. At this point halving the amount of time that df takes is
going to give you a few percent.
Kenny
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34400