This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/34400] [4.3 regression] bad interaction between DF and SJLJ exceptions
- From: "zadeck at naturalbridge dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 17 Dec 2007 16:01:54 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/34400] [4.3 regression] bad interaction between DF and SJLJ exceptions
- References: <bug-34400-286@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #34 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-12-17 16:01 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] bad interaction between
DF and SJLJ exceptions
ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #33 from ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org 2007-12-17 15:35 -------
> Here are the numbers; there is a spectacular improvement, but 4.3 is still an
> order of magnitude slower than 4.2:
>
> With df_hack3 alone:
> real 1m5.705s
> user 1m5.184s
> sys 0m0.412s
>
> With df_double_queue_worklist alone:
> real 4m8.383s
> user 4m6.055s
> sys 0m0.636s
>
> With df_hack3 and df_double_queue_worklist:
> real 1m6.834s
> user 1m6.024s
> sys 0m0.376s
>
> With df_hack2 and df_hack3:
> real 0m54.194s
> user 0m53.511s
> sys 0m0.324s
>
> With df_hack2, df_hack3 and df_double_queue_worklist:
> real 0m54.132s
> user 0m53.691s
> sys 0m0.372s
>
>
>
can you send us a time report for this so we can see if we have changed
who the bad actors are?
by "this" i mean all three patches together.
kenny
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34400