This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/34400] [4.3 regression] bad interaction between DF and SJLJ exceptions



------- Comment #34 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com  2007-12-17 16:01 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.3 regression] bad interaction between
 DF and SJLJ exceptions

ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #33 from ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org  2007-12-17 15:35 -------
> Here are the numbers; there is a spectacular improvement, but 4.3 is still an
> order of magnitude slower than 4.2:
>
> With df_hack3 alone:
> real    1m5.705s
> user    1m5.184s
> sys     0m0.412s
>
> With df_double_queue_worklist alone:
> real    4m8.383s
> user    4m6.055s
> sys     0m0.636s
>
> With df_hack3 and df_double_queue_worklist:
> real    1m6.834s
> user    1m6.024s
> sys     0m0.376s
>
> With df_hack2 and df_hack3:
> real    0m54.194s
> user    0m53.511s
> sys     0m0.324s
>
> With df_hack2, df_hack3 and df_double_queue_worklist:
> real    0m54.132s
> user    0m53.691s
> sys     0m0.372s
>
>
>   
can you send us a time report for this so we can see if we have changed
who the bad actors are?

by "this" i mean all three patches together.

kenny


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34400


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]