This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/33943] [4.3 Regression] ICE with partial specialization on vararg template template parameter
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Dec 2007 21:27:47 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/33943] [4.3 Regression] ICE with partial specialization on vararg template template parameter
- References: <bug-33943-13491@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-16 21:27 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> I disagree with Andrew's Comment #4. Once we implement a feature in the
> compiler, users should reasonably expect it to be correct. We cannot
> simultaneously say "Look, we have exciting new C++0x features!" and "Oh, you
> found a bug? That's not very serious, since it's just a new C++0x feature."
I seriously disagree, this is not a regression in that code never was supported
before and really C++0x support should not block the release just because
people feel this is an important feature of 4.3.0. Also another thing is that
we have some ODR violations in libstdc++ that the libstdc++ folks have not
replied to me about yet.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2007-08/msg00032.html and some others.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33943