This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug bootstrap/34474] find from BusyBox v1.2.2 does not support logical OR (-o argument)



------- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-12-16 12:58 -------
Well it is we assume a lot of things are POSIX support so I don't see why we
have to document find here really.  Yes we document we need a POSIX shell but
that is because a semi common target (Solaris)'s /bin/sh is not POSIX
compatible.  It is not common to find a non POSIX compatible find (or one that
does not support the find options).

The main reason why I don't want to see two finds is because find is actually
can be expensive.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34474


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]