This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/34255] scope-blocks-on-a-diet patch diverges -g from non-g output code
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Nov 2007 10:14:59 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/34255] scope-blocks-on-a-diet patch diverges -g from non-g output code
- References: <bug-34255-334@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-28 10:14 -------
Confirmed. The mentioned patch has been applied to the trunk already.
> The patch not only causes -g divergence, it also accidentally drops subblocks
> that need to be kept around for the sake of generating debug information for
> them.
This is certainly bad and needs to be (is already) fixed.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01745.html regresses the property
> that code output with -g must be the same as that without -g. make
> bootstrap-debug demonstrates that several files miscompare after this patch,
> and don't if the patch is reversed.
This causes memory-usage regressions for non-debug builds, for example for
tramp3d-v4 at -O2 -Dleafify=flatten which (peak) memory-usage grows from 807MB
to 1248MB. (Worse if you also add -fopenmp, less worse if you drop
-Dleafify=flatten)
The following two patches
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00523.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00524.html
probably address the latter problem in a more efficient way.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-11-28 10:14:58
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34255