This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/34163] New: 10% performance regression since Nov 1 on Polyhedron's "NF" on AMD64
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Nov 2007 15:00:22 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/34163] New: 10% performance regression since Nov 1 on Polyhedron's "NF" on AMD64
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
According to http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench/polyhedron/, the run time of
"NF" increased from 37.70s to 41.57s (+10%) between 071031 and 071101. This is
an AMD Opteron system.
The same result I obtained at
http://physik.fu-berlin.de/~tburnus/gcc-trunk/benchmark/
also on an AMD64. Interestingly, while x86-64 (-m64) gets slower, using -m32 I
don't see any change (apart of noise) - neither for x87 nor for SSE(3).
To boil it down to version numbers, I believe the change must have happened
between the following versions:
Fast:
4.3.0 20071031 (experimental) [trunk revision 129791]
Slow:
4.3.0 20071031 (experimental) [trunk revision 129797]
As culpits there are essentially only the following checkins possible:
- PR tree-optimization/32377 (compute_overlap_steps_for_affine_univar)
Make it work also for unknown number of iterations. [Sebastian Pop]
- PR middle-end/33779 fold-const.c (extract_muldiv_1): Make sure to not
introduce new undefined integer overflow. [Richard Guenther]
- PR fortran/33897 decl.c (gfc_match_entry): Do not make ENTRY name
global for contained procedures.
parse.c (gfc_fixup_sibling_symbols): Fix code for determining whether
a procedure is external. [Paul Thomas]
The Polyhedron test case is available from:
http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/MFL6VW74649
--
Summary: 10% performance regression since Nov 1 on Polyhedron's
"NF" on AMD64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34163