This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/33698] FAIL: gfortran.dg/gamma_5.f90
- From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Nov 2007 18:40:47 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/33698] FAIL: gfortran.dg/gamma_5.f90
- References: <bug-33698-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #20 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 18:40 -------
Created an attachment (id=14519)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14519&action=view)
gamma from netlib, converted to C
(In reply to comment #18)
> OTOH, maybe using straight Netlib code would be better.
Thomas, here is my C version of the netlib gamma, including some testing code.
I also think using the netlib version is rather safe and we shouldn't take any
risk for a fallback implementation of a math function.
I can work on the C version of lgamma at some point in the week-end, if you
want me to.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33698