This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/33940] call of overloaded 'basic_string(const<anonymous class>&)' is ambiguous for a template member function
- From: "gzljg at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Oct 2007 17:00:33 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/33940] call of overloaded 'basic_string(const<anonymous class>&)' is ambiguous for a template member function
- References: <bug-33940-13880@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #2 from gzljg at hotmail dot com 2007-10-29 17:00 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> A couple of quick comments. First, there is nothing special about std::string,
> the same happens with std::vector<char>, for example, because really the issue
> is about multiple constructors. Second, I checked that at least 2 other
> compilers + library behave the same as GCC. In short, I don't think this issue
> is valid, there is a real ambiguity in the user code.
>
Thanks for Paolo's input. I understand it's nothing to do with std::string,
just because my test case use std::string that causes the error. What I was
confused is why the compiler is ambiguious about the T()'s constructor, _even_
I hard coded to use "std::string()" in the example?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33940