This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/33698] FAIL: gfortran.dg/gamma_5.f90
- From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Oct 2007 10:17:06 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/33698] FAIL: gfortran.dg/gamma_5.f90
- References: <bug-33698-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-20 10:17 -------
I am tempted not to use gamma*() at all, but rather
check for tgamma*() and lgamma*() and use that
if available. If none of them are present, use
a fallback implementation.
This avoids potential problems with cross-compilation
when gamma() has a different meaning for host and
target system.
What a mess...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33698