This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/32252] [4.3 regression] ICE with variadic templates and arrays
- From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 Oct 2007 20:27:08 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/32252] [4.3 regression] ICE with variadic templates and arrays
- References: <bug-32252-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-19 20:27 -------
In fact at some point I'd like to open a discussion about what we consider a
*regression*. I mean, *regression* means to me, roughly, "something used to
work and now all of a sudden doesn't work anymore, we must quickly fix it!".
However, we mark PRs as [4.1/4.2/4.3 regression], and that very often means
something different! Because we often mark like that issues which date back to
3.4 or even 3.3! And that because we want only to mention active branches.
Overall, I think this approach may be very confusing. Another, smaller, issue
is that in case of ICEs on invalid should be more clear from the PR whether it
happens only in development builds, or not: the latter are definitely less
serious, IMO, at least now that we have "confused by earlier errors..."
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32252