[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

["dougkwan at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Comment #3 from dougkwan at google dot com  2007-10-08 19:50 -------
Subject: Re:  FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess
errors)

That's strange. I am looking at it. I ran the libstdc++ testsuite
before and did not see this problem.

-Doug

8 Oct 2007 19:32:42 -0000, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>:
>
>
> ------- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2007-10-08 19:32 -------
> Subject: Re:  FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess
> errors)
>
> > ------- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2007-10-08 18:57 -------
> > So the problem is new, right? Has it to do with the recent fixes for the
> > deadlock bug?
>
> Looking at the testresults, it appears to have been introduced between
> 128587 and 128594 in September.  The only patch of significance in this
> period is Jason's 128590.  It's not obvious to me why this would have
> affected the behavior of -pedantic.
>
> Dave
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700