This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/23194] Unhelpful diagnostic for incorrect pointer-to-member function syntax
- From: "pinskia at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Oct 2007 23:59:02 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/23194] Unhelpful diagnostic for incorrect pointer-to-member function syntax
- References: <bug-23194-5876@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-02 23:59 -------
Subject: Re: Unhelpful diagnostic for incorrect pointer-to-member function
syntax
On 2 Oct 2007 23:54:04 -0000, jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> ------- Comment #6 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2007-10-02 23:54 -------
> (From update of attachment 14287)
> >+ "function in %<%E (...)%>, e.g. %<(... ->* %E) (...)%>",
> >+ original, original);
> > return error_mark_node;
It might be better to use %$1E (I think that is how it is done) so you
don't have to pass original twice.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194