This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/31988] new operator should not permit default first parameter



------- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2007-09-28 16:11 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm not a GCC expert, but that patch looks like it will silently change the
> behaviour of the compiler when -pedantic is not given.

When -pedantic is not given (the default) a pedwarn is an hard error. A pedwarn
becomes a warning when -permissive is passes (and the code is thus accepted as
an extension, which I would find useful for legacy code). But I have no strong
opinion, in general.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31988


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]