This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/32395] false positive warning about use of uninitialized variable.
- From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Sep 2007 00:58:02 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/32395] false positive warning about use of uninitialized variable.
- References: <bug-32395-7667@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #11 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-27 00:58 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Manuel, ping, do you working on it?
> i've posted preprocessed 32-bit testaces for you over month ago ;)
> btw. PR32368 exposes this bug.
>
Sorry, I am probably doing something wrong but I cannot get it to compile.
Weird.
manuel@gcc11:~$ 128590/build/gcc/cc1plus src/multi_index_test.ii -O1 -Wall
-Wfatal-errors
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2.1/bits/stl_algobase.h:73,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2.1/algorithm:66,
from /usr/include/boost/multi_index_container.hpp:20,
from multi_index_test.cpp:2:
/usr/include/c++/4.2.1/bits/cpp_type_traits.h: At global scope:
/usr/include/c++/4.2.1/bits/cpp_type_traits.h:346: error: expected identifier
before â??__is_podâ??
and
manu@localhost:~/$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,treelang --prefix=/usr
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib
--without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls
--program-suffix=-4.1 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-mpfr --enable-checking=release i486-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)
manu@localhost:~/$ g++ -Wall -O1 -c multi_index_test.ii -Wfatal-errors
/usr/include/c++/4.2.1/x86_64-pld-linux/32/bits/c++config.h:149: error:
expected `=' before â??__attribute__â??
compilation terminated due to -Wfatal-errors.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32395