This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/33277] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap check failures ICE's



------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-02 11:41 -------
[18:22] < apinski> 
/home/apinski/src/local/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c:5:
error: could not split insn^M
[18:22] < apinski> new failure
[18:23] < apinski> on ppc-linux-gnu
[18:23] < apinski> between 127935 and 128000

>GPL3 has been dismissed by the world.

WTF does this have to do with 930921-1.c ICE????  I am seriously thinking about
ignoring all the bug reports from you from now on because of this crap.  GCC is
owned (copyrighted) by the FSF and GPLv3 is th official license from them and
they get to decide on the license not us, we can influence somewhat but they
are the official word.


>This and recent submissions by the Debian-gcc-team prove the point.

You know, there are many different targets that GCC supports, sometimes the
patch does not cause any regression on one target can cause regressions on
others.  This happens all the time.  You need to understand the main reason why
we have the testsuite is so we easily see when a target has a regression or
not.  Now if you want to report bugs, please do so without this extra crap
because it gets in the way of actually fixing it and it makes people think you
are crazy and should not be listened to.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|target                      |middle-end


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33277


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]