This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/21580] Less-than-ideal code generation for incrementing volatile variables
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Aug 2007 00:21:33 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/21580] Less-than-ideal code generation for incrementing volatile variables
- References: <bug-21580-10216@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 00:21 -------
>omewhat also related, "(void)x;" still accesses memory when x is volatile --
> I suppose this might be desirable, however.
It is because you say to load from x.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21580