This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/32720] [4.3 Regression] No coalesce ssa_names
- From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Jul 2007 14:47:48 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/32720] [4.3 Regression] No coalesce ssa_names
- References: <bug-32720-14789@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #11 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-27 14:47 -------
Here is the shortest Fortran testcase I could come with:
$ cat a.f90
subroutine foo
integer :: i
do
i = i + 1
select case (' ')
case default
call bar (i + 1, i - 1)
end select
enddo
end subroutine foo
$ gfortran -O2 -c a.f90
Unable to coalesce ssa_names 1 and 3 which are marked as MUST COALESCE.
i_1(ab) and i_3(ab)
a.f90: In function ?foo?:
a.f90:1: internal compiler error: SSA corruption
I tried to make a C testcase from the original tree dump of this Fortran code,
but couldn't reproduce the ICE. It probably depends on the exact blocks
inserted.
Anyway, please note that starting with rev. 126978, the Fortran front-end emits
different code for this code (due to better translation of SELECT for character
variables, fixing PR32035), and thus the ICE is not triggered by the reporter's
code (nor is it triggered by my reduced testcase).
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-07-27 14:47:48
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32720