This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/16696] Strange message when operator++ not found
- From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Jul 2007 18:27:15 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/16696] Strange message when operator++ not found
- References: <bug-16696-102@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #11 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-07-07 18:27 -------
One comment, to avoid wasting time (I don't have the time to understand why the
old library-simulation of concept checks is discussed in a C++ PR): for sure we
are not going to enable by default the simulated concept checks (and all the
compile-time performace issues and slight non-conformance issues). It's way,
way, too late for that. *Real* concepts are finally, gloriously coming in
C++0x. We can only consider slightly tweaking what we have in case some of the
"concepts" are slightly off. Only a tad above regression-only mode.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16696