This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/31164] Problem with GCC 4.1 and Boost signals
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 1 Jul 2007 09:13:28 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/31164] Problem with GCC 4.1 and Boost signals
- References: <bug-31164-14236@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-01 09:13 -------
>The test runs differently when compiled with g++-3.4.6 (GCC) 3.4.6 (Gentoo 3.4.6-r2, ssp-3.4.6-1.0,
> pie-8.7.10) and g++-4.1.2 (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2) versions of the GCC
Yes and 4.1.x result is the correct according to the standard.
"We are in default template function" should be printed because the overloaded
set for visit_each in visit_each (with two arguments) is the only one because
the types are not in the namespace of bugsrus.
I have not looked into the original testcase yet but the new one is correct for
4.1 (see gcc-4.1/changes.html for more info).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31164