This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold
- From: "ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Jun 2007 05:44:39 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold
- References: <bug-20623-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #35 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-25 05:44 -------
(In reply to comment #34)
> (In reply to comment #33)
> > (In reply to comment #32)
> > > Everyone: Don't forget "df", it doesn't slow checking much.
> > > Compile + check time < 16 hours :) only:
> > > --enable-stage1-checking=assert,df,fold,gc,misc,rtl,rtlflag,runtime,tree
> > To avoid forgetting anything, try "yes,rtl,fold" as your checking options.
> Would that enable gcac. Is gcac less useful and very very slow.
The "yes" option does not invoke "gcac". It is equivalent to the default on
mainline, as if you didn't specify any checking flags. Look in
gcc/configure.ac and search for "gcac" or "rtlflag" and you'll see the shell
code in question.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20623