This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/32347] ICE on gcc/testsuite/gcc-dg/vmx/ops.c
- From: "malitzke at metronets dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 Jun 2007 23:57:34 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/32347] ICE on gcc/testsuite/gcc-dg/vmx/ops.c
- References: <bug-32347-11706@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #12 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2007-06-19 23:57 -------
Why is this still unconfirmed after the corrobation by Mrs Johnson?
Personally I could not care less if it is swept under the rug, like so many
other
PR's. Without-altivec would suit me fine as altivec is, to me, just a competive
and unnecessary competitive response, by then Motorola, to Intel's SSE, which
to me is just gumming up the X86 part of the compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32347