This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/32386] Pure function not allowed in specification expression
- From: "John dot Harper at mcs dot vuw dot ac dot nz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Jun 2007 02:42:50 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/32386] Pure function not allowed in specification expression
- References: <bug-32386-6246@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #3 from John dot Harper at mcs dot vuw dot ac dot nz 2007-06-18 02:42 -------
Subject: Re: Pure function not allowed in specification
expression
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Date: 18 Jun 2007 01:00:47 -0000
> From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
> To: john.harper@vuw.ac.nz
> Subject: [Bug fortran/32386] Pure function not allowed in specification
> expression
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 01:00 -------
> Not saying whether this is valid or not. However Intel ifort says:
>
> fortcom: Error: john.f90, line 13: An automatic object is invalid in a main
> program. [STRINGB]
> CHARACTER(len(halfit(stringa))) :: stringb
> -----------------------------------^
> compilation aborted for john.f90 (code 1)
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32386
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
I think Intel is wrong because my stringb is not an automatic object.
Its length depends on LEN of a pure module function of a constant.
-- John Harper, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science,
Victoria University, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
e-mail john.harper@vuw.ac.nz phone (+64)(4)463 5341 fax (+64)(4)463 5045
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32386