This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug other/32263] Document the required versions of glibc and binutils
- From: "appfault at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Jun 2007 17:56:49 -0000
- Subject: [Bug other/32263] Document the required versions of glibc and binutils
- References: <bug-32263-7959@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #5 from appfault at hotmail dot com 2007-06-13 17:56 -------
Ok well, I'll take your word on that, since I can't really tell where gcc and
ld end and glibc begins. It's perhaps glibc that is in need of better
documentation then. However if I file such a zilla I suspect it will quickly
be marked duplicate of http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=333
...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32263