This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/31970] set<>::iterator vs type-safety
- From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Jun 2007 00:20:11 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/31970] set<>::iterator vs type-safety
- References: <bug-31970-14562@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-06-10 00:20 -------
That question occured to me too... Now I'm thinking that probably isn't a real
issue assuming good optimizers, as usual. Do you have a practical example?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31970