This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug other/32263] Document the required versions of glibc and binutils
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Jun 2007 20:16:22 -0000
- Subject: [Bug other/32263] Document the required versions of glibc and binutils
- References: <bug-32263-7959@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-08 20:16 -------
HUH? I had never had any problems with older versions of GCC with newer
versions of binutils. If you do then either it is a bug in the older version
of GCC (which is likely) or a bug in the newer binutils (which is also likely).
If you have issues with either, then you should provide more details. I have
used GCC 2.95.3-4.1 with binutils 2.17 (which is quiet new) without any
troubles and glibc 2.3.6 with GCC 2.95.3 (which had one issue with respect of
locales) to 4.1 without any issues. So I don't see what we need to document
here really.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32263