This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/29365] Unnecessary anonymous namespace warnings
- From: "pluto at agmk dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Jun 2007 10:08:51 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/29365] Unnecessary anonymous namespace warnings
- References: <bug-29365-7796@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #28 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-06-06 10:08 -------
(In reply to comment #27)
> It is not like GCC is a closed source program either,
> you can try to make a fix for the issue too.
Andrew, real world is not so simple ;)
some time ago Manuel López-Ibáñez helps me create official patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302#c22
patch was submitted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg01347.html
added to tracker:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302#c23
and pinged:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00604.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00110.html
c.a. 3 months and no effects for tested trivial patch.
no accecpt, no reject, no commit, no fun.
in current situation i feel no reason to working
on another patch while the GCC-Team redirect external
patches to /dev/null.
moreover, gcc lists are full of patch-ping^N-noeffects.
i think people are not motivated to cooperate with GCC-Team.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29365