This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/32057] Random failure on gfortran.dg/secnds.f
- From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 30 May 2007 21:35:49 -0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/32057] Random failure on gfortran.dg/secnds.f
- References: <bug-32057-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-30 21:35 -------
> a and c are actually a little more accurate at the end.
> Its also interesting that this deviation between the methods
> appears to happen only near the end of the sequence.
> I have visually scanned in quite a few places and all three are
> identical until this point.
What I expect is:
below 16384s ~4.5 hours, all the results are equal almost all the time,
below 32768s ~9 hours, all the results are equal +/- ~1 ms,
below 65536s ~18 hours, all the results are equal +/- ~2ms,
and for the following ~6 hours, all the results are equal +/- ~4ms
(~spacing(65536.0)/2.0).
Does it fit with what you saw?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32057