This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/29286] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] placement new does not change the dynamic type as it should
- From: "gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 22 May 2007 19:12:44 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/29286] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] placement new does not change the dynamic type as it should
- References: <bug-29286-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #121 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-05-22 20:12 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] placement new does not change the
dynamic type as it should
"mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
[...]
| And, although I don't have the time/energy that you seem to have to work
| on these standards issues, I do plan to oppose your interpretation on
| the reflector.
I believe you'll have hard time proving that my interpretation is
INcorrect according to the *current* standard (C++98, C++03), and
under obvious reading.
Since, I'm not suggesting a change to the current standsard to match
my interpretation -- since it already does -- and the only change I'll
be proposing is to make C++0x match C99 rules, if you're going to oppose my
proposed changes, then you are going to oppose a change that allows
TBAA in the form currently implemented in GCC.
I'm not sure, that really is what you wanted.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29286