This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/31995] can't determine dependence between p->a[x+i] and p->a[x+i+1]



------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-05-20 21:44 -------
Created an attachment (id=13591)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13591&action=view)
new patch

This new patch changes one little thing dealing with how with indirect
references are handled in dr_analyze_indices.  If we already inserted indices
for array references and the indirect reference is not changing, dnn't add that
index of 0.  This lets us get rid of the chang in build_classic_dist_vector_1
which I was worried about.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #13587|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31995


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]