This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/31836] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/extractors_arithmetic/char/12.cc execution test
- From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 May 2007 23:51:54 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/31836] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/extractors_arithmetic/char/12.cc execution test
- References: <bug-31836-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #15 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-05-07 00:51 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] FAIL:
27_io/basic_istream/extractors_arithmetic/char/12.cc execution test
> I told you that at the beginning of this thread, right? Then, you reported that
> the portion of 12.cc about *short* type is failing, and that has nothing to do
> with that change, doesn't make any sense frankly. Therefore, either something
> changed in the memory layout, a latent miscompilation is triggered, or
> something else, definitely, nothing I can fix with the info I have from you.
I understand that. There's only two changes in the interval that are
significant (r123630 and r123635 -- r123636 was reverted). If it's
a latent miscompilation, I still want to know which change exposed
the problem.
The test is failing on both 32 and 64-bit hpux, but not
on linux. The code generated for the linux target is generally
very similar to 32-bit hpux target and usually miscompilations
appear on both.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31836