This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/31269] short-circuit in -fbounds-check
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Mar 2007 20:58:02 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/31269] short-circuit in -fbounds-check
- References: <bug-31269-9375@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-20 20:58 -------
> But I'll stop this discussion here, and will stay with g95 when I want to
> bound-check my program.
Why short circuiting is legal and so is not short circuiting. Yes Gfortran's
behavior is semi inconstaint but that does not make gfortran's behavior
incorrect. In fact I want to say Gfortran's behavior with -fbounds-check with
not short circuiting is actually a good thing because you catch more
invalid/undefined fortran code that way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31269