This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/30915] [4.3 regression] bootstrap fails while building libstdc++-v3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
- From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Mar 2007 13:26:35 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/30915] [4.3 regression] bootstrap fails while building libstdc++-v3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
- References: <bug-30915-7220@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #11 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-03-11 13:26 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Note hovewer, that currently __cplusplus in the official GNU tree at least is
> still *1*. Is it possible that only *Gentoo* GCC has an external patch
> defining __cplusplus as 199711L???
But that doesn't matter, because the newly built FSF GCC still defines
__cplusplus as 1 (in licpp/init.c, by the way). I'm lost... We badly need
details about the behavior of the two snippets, a time-range for the appearance
of the problem, anything to restrict the number of possibilities...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30915