This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/30832] [regression] --with-sysroot=foobar wrong handled
- From: "mtrudel at gmx dot ch" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 Feb 2007 08:25:57 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/30832] [regression] --with-sysroot=foobar wrong handled
- References: <bug-30832-13027@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #7 from mtrudel at gmx dot ch 2007-02-19 08:25 -------
Well, it makes sense that the kernel-source is also needed. But then again, we
have four setups:
1. GCC 4.2, build=linux, host=linux, target=linux
2. GCC 4.2, build=linux, host=mingw, target=linux
3. GCC 4.3, build=linux, host=linux, target=linux
4. GCC 4.3, build=linux, host=mingw, target=linux
For all, I specify --with-sysroot but not --with-build-sysroot and put glibc
and glibc-devel into the specified sysroot. For setup 1, 2 and 4 this works.
Only setup 3 is missing "linux/limits.h". So, how probable is that we have 3
builds that work although they shouldn't and only one that does the right thing
by failing?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30832