This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc



------- Comment #26 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-16 17:01 -------
Paolo Carlini, why did you revert the xfail?  That's *not* according to
procedure.
I really resent that, but please discuss the issue on the gcc@ or gcc-patches@
lists, not here.  If it was the extra FAIL lines for ICEing targets, I now know
how to limit the xfail using dg-xfail-if.
I also don't see any message on gcc-patches@ or libstdc++@ about the reversion.
Regarding binary search, I suggest you read the description of this PR.
The revision exposing the bug is already identified.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]