This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/29975] [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K
- From: "jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Feb 2007 17:09:30 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/29975] [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K
- References: <bug-29975-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #50 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-02-12 17:09 -------
> > I really think CP2K should be added to some nightly
> > tester somewhere by gfortran developers...
>
> Well, I second that, but we first need to get it working (like, the middle-end
> people have to move on PR30391).
>
I agree that are two separate issues. One is to get it to work (and keep it
that way), and the other would be to monitor runtime performance. For the
latter issue I can prepare reasonable benchmark inputs, while for the former I
think it is good enough to just compile the tarbal from the initial comment.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29975