[Bug fortran/30478] FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

["Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Comment #30 from Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de  2007-02-12 01:21 -------
Subject: Re:  FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90  -O  (internal
 compiler error)

dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote:
> ------- Comment #29 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2007-02-12 01:15 -------
> Subject: Re:  FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90  -O  (internal compiler error)
> 
>> ------- Comment #27 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-12 01:03 -------
>> (In reply to comment #6)
>>> Fortran is not release-critical and this bug appears to be purely within the
>>> Fortran front end.
>> Should I commit the patch for the next release candidate once the branch is
>> unfrozen?  Personally, I don't believe this a sufficiently important bug (being
>> an ICE on weird invalid code designed deliberately to break the compiler), but
>> if you don't want this regression in the release, I'll happily commit it in
>> time for the next release candidate.
> 
> Mark always says that if it's not c++ ;)
> 
> Since it's a regression, I believe it's your call.  The test could
> be xfail'd if you decide the benefits aren't worth the risk.

User-visibility of the bug is probably zero, so I don't think this is 
important enough :)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30478