This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/20201] requesting -Wfatal-errors=n
- From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Feb 2007 12:05:18 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/20201] requesting -Wfatal-errors=n
- References: <bug-20201-365@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-09 12:05 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> One problem with this proposal is that sometimes the user just wants one actual
> error (the C++ error messages are multiline, but are still one message) and it
> is difficult to estimate what a good value of <n> is to ensure that you always
> get sufficient context. When the error information is inadequate, you have to
> run the compiler again with a higher value of <n>, which is cumbersome.
>
One error should be just 1 error, independently of the number of lines that it
takes to be printed.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20201