This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/30549] compiler warning in resolve.c: possibly uninitialized use of name



------- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-23 06:26 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> > No, that means it is used possiable as null.
> > You need to check inside pure_function to see if there is a way that the 
> > second argument does not get initialized.
> 
> There is:
>   if (e->symtree != NULL
>         && e->symtree->n.sym != NULL
>         && e->symtree->n.sym->attr.proc == PROC_ST_FUNCTION)
>     return 1;
> 
> One could thus either add a line in pure_function or in "resolve_function" to
> set name to null. Or in both. Having it in "resolve_function" means we get rid
> of this warning.
> 

No, it must be


  if (e->symtree != NULL
        && e->symtree->n.sym != NULL
        && e->symtree->n.sym->attr.proc == PROC_ST_FUNCTION)
    {
      *name = e->symtree->n.sym->name;
      return 1;
    }
for consistency.

Paul

PS That was my doing, so will fix as obvious.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30549


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]