[Bug fortran/30399] testsuite failures in actual_array_constructor_2.f90 and actual_array_substr_2.f90

["paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Comment #14 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr  2007-01-10 22:09 -------
Subject: Re:  testsuite failures in actual_array_constructor_2.f90
  and actual_array_substr_2.f90

Kaveh
> ------- Comment #13 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-10 21:45 -------
> Paul - The bug is not "FIXED" in 4.0, please don't mark it as such yet. 
> "WONTFIX" may be a more accurate description if that is the group decision. 
> You can remove yourself from the assigned field if you aren't able to work on
> it.
>   
I am sorry, but I genuinely thought that only the testscases were present:

I checked out fortran and the testsuite from gcc-4_0-branch and could 
not find any trace of this patch in the ChangeLogs but the testcases ARE 
there.  On this basis, I thought that there was nothing to fix.
> Regarding your last checkin to 4.0, the archives seem to show that you were the
> one who checked in the testcase and the fortran patches.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_2.f90?view=log
>
> So I'm somewhat mystified by your "hands unknown" comment. :-)
>   
The evidence is incontrovertible :-)   OK, it is obvious that I am 
missing something here. Why does the 4.0 branch not reflect this patch?
> Could you please take a second look?  Maybe the whole patch and the testcases
> should be reverted on 4.0?
>   
Yes, please.  Note that this is not a WONTFIX but rather a CANTFIX; my 
time is taken by other things than gcc, right now, and, additionally, I 
no longer have a 4.0 tree; in fact I just scrubbed 4.1 as well.

I am not trying to be difficult, cantankerous or awkward - I tried to 
look into it and just do not understand what is going on.

Cheers

Paul


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30399