This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/30409] [fortran] missed optimization with pure function arguments



------- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-09 16:08 -------
Note,  above the first FORALL statement one needs to add
the following 2 lines of code

xmin = 0.
xmax = 1.

As a side note, both Pathscale and Intel in the c.l.f thread have
acknowledged that their compilers also miss this optimization.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30409


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]