This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/29975] [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Jan 2007 09:22:00 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/29975] [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K
- References: <bug-29975-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #46 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-06 09:22 -------
(In reply to comment #44)
> Current gcc ICEs again on CP2K
I tried to reproduce this with gfortran (trunk) of yesterday with CP2k of today
- and I failed to get an ICE. I tried then to directly use gfortran-4.2 (also
yesterday's version) without any ICE. I also tried gfortran 4.3 20070102.
> gfortran -c -O3 -ftree-vectorize -ffast-math -march=opteron -fopenmp
> mc_coordinates.f90
> mc_coordinates.f90: In function ?check_for_overlap?:
> mc_coordinates.f90:192: internal compiler error: in operand_equal_p, at
> fold-const.c:2539
This is in my CP2k:
box_length(1:3)=abc(1:3)
where
REAL(KIND=dp), DIMENSION(1:3) :: abc, box_length
Can you try to find the minimal set of options which causes this bug?
e.g. -O0 no -ftree-vectorize -ffast-math, no -fopenmp etc.
What is your exact version of gfortran?
By the way, I think one should leave in future this PR closed and open new PR;
this PR is a wild mixure between a meta bug (5 dependend bugs, now fixed) and a
couple of rather independent bugs reported directly here.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|pault at gcc dot gnu dot org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
| |dot org
Status|REOPENED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29975