[Bug target/30259] [4.1 branch] ICE on valid code

["edmar at freescale dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Comment #4 from edmar at freescale dot com  2006-12-20 16:11 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Subject: Re:  [4.1 branch] ICE on valid code
> 
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, edmar at freescale dot com wrote:
> 
> > Still, On December 16 I had a complete build, and on December 17 I have an ICE.
> > It feels more like a regression than moving forward...
> 
> A complete build with, no doubt, all C++ tests failing with the problem 
> you noted in <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-09/msg00126.html>.  Because 
> such a build is not particularly useful, I have taken a base with 
> t-ppccomm hacked to avoid building libgcc with -mlong-double-128 as the 
> appropriate baseline for testing.
I disagree with that. First there is the C compiler, which is the most used by
our customers, second, the C++ problem was manageable. Those are dejagnu
results (C, C++, gfortran) from December 12:
# of expected passes            40225
# of unexpected failures        58
# of expected failures          81
# of unresolved testcases       94
# of untested testcases         28
# of unsupported tests          493
# of expected passes            13148
# of unexpected failures        43
# of unexpected successes       2
# of expected failures          65
# of unresolved testcases       40
# of unsupported tests          136
# of expected passes            15334
# of unexpected failures        94
# of expected failures          6
# of unresolved testcases       6
# of unsupported tests          91


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30259